Nutrition / Performance

When running on empty, caffeine to the rescue!

Cereal CoffeeIt’s time for your weekend long run. Before heading out, do you fuel up with a bowl of cereal or a fruit smoothie? Rev-up with a cup of coffee or espresso shot? Or just grab your water bottle and hit the road on empty? Along with sleep, a proper training regimen, and adequate recovery, our choice of pre-run fuel is perhaps one of the most critical factors in determining how we perform, both on today’s run and years into the future.

Train low, race high

An increasing number of runners are adhering to the “train low, race high” tactic. This involves performing training runs with diminished glucose reserves, often achieved through fasting or completing back-to-back workouts, but restoring glucose levels through rest and carbohydrate intake for competition. Earlier research 1,2 has shown that this technique induces positive training adaptations, mediated by altered cell signaling and transcriptional regulation of proteins involved in muscle cell metabolism. These studies provide some evidence, albeit limited and inconclusive, that these metabolic changes may improve performance over time. However, training low is not without its drawbacks, as any runner who’s hit the wall from low blood sugar can attest. If only we could reap the long-term metabolic benefits of low-energy training without the immediate battle with fatigue and premature bonking. A new study suggests that caffeine just may be the secret ingredient that allows endurance athletes to have their cake – without eating it too.

Caffeine to the rescue

In their study 3, Stephen Lane and colleagues tested how caffeine and the availability of glycogen, which is broken down into glucose as our muscles’ main energy source, interactively affect cycling performance. Twelve trained endurance cyclists completed four test sessions each. At each session, the participants completed high-intensity-interval training, consisting of eight five-minute trials at maximal cycling intensity. The researchers monitored heart rate, power output, cadence and perceived exertion, as well as collected blood samples to measure glucose and free fatty acid levels. At each session, the cyclists were randomly assigned to a low- or high-glycogen condition, and a caffeine or placebo condition. Participants completed a 100-minute cycling session either two hours before testing, to deplete muscle glycogen (low condition), or 24 hours before testing, to allow sufficient recovery of glycogen levels (high condition). Then, an hour before each test trial, the cyclists took either 3 mg/kg caffeine, approximately 200 mg for a 150 pound individual (the equivalent of a cup of coffee), or a placebo pill.

As expected, when the cyclists’ muscle glycogen was depleted, their cycling power output was reduced by about 8% compared to when they cycled with normal glycogen levels. Critically, regardless of glycogen availability, caffeine improved power output by about 3%, and the effects of caffeine and glycogen did not interact (i.e. they did not influence one another). Note that caffeine couldn’t completely compensate for the performance deficit induced by glycogen depletion, but any boost is still a boost!

We’ve long known that carbohydrates and caffeine are both performance enhancers 4,5, so what’s so novel about this finding? One possible explanation for caffeine’s benefits is that it somehow improves performance by facilitating carbohydrate use, in which case caffeine might fail miserably at increasing performance when glycogen is low. But intriguingly, the study showed that the energy boost from caffeine does not depend on glycogen levels, so you can still get that performance bump while training on empty. If caffeine’s effects aren’t in fact mediated by carbohydrate metabolism, what energy source does it tap into? Interestingly, the researchers found that free fatty acid levels were elevated after caffeine consumption, suggesting that caffeine might allow muscles to more efficiently metabolize fats, rather than rely on muscle glycogen stores.

Coffee RunnerFuel for running, fuel for research

As the authors point out, their findings only show immediate performance perks from caffeine, and don’t inform about how caffeine influences the known long-term metabolic adaptations induced by low-energy training. Follow-up studies will also be necessary to show whether caffeine has similar effects when energy stores are depleted through fasting, rather than through repeat workouts. As a distance runner, I would be particularly interested in seeing whether these effects hold up during running, as well as during more prolonged bouts of endurance testing.

So if you’re looking to run hard and feel great, a granola bar and coffee might be a match made in heaven. However, if your goal is to stay strong while gaining long-term improvements in metabolic efficiency, a cup of joe might be all you need.

References

  1. Hansen AK et al. 2005. Skeletal muscle adaptation: training twice every second day vs. training once daily. J Appl Physiol 98:93-9.
  2. Hawley JA & Burke LM. 2010. Carbohydrate availability and training adaptation: effects on cell metabolism. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 38:152-60.
  3. Lane SC et al. 2013. Caffeine Ingestion and Cycling Power Output in a Low or Normal Muscle Glycogen State. Med Sci Sports Exerc.
  4. Graham TE & Spriet LL. 1995. Metabolic, catecholamine, and exercise performance responses to various doses of caffeine. J Appl Physiol 78:867-74.
  5. Jeukendrup AE. 2004. Carbohydrate intake during exercise and performance. Nutrition 20:669-77.

ResearchBlogging.org
Lane, S., Areta, J., Bird, S., Coffey, V., Burke, L., Desbrow, B., Karagounis, L., & Hawley, J. (2013). Caffeine Ingestion and Cycling Power Output in a Low or Normal Muscle Glycogen State Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31828af183

About these ads

2 thoughts on “When running on empty, caffeine to the rescue!

  1. I can tell you this, if you eat small healthy meals 4-6 times a day it wil speed up your mibetolasm. See, there are two things homeostasis and metbolism. Your body wants to remain at a certain weight, what it is used to( homeostasis ). Thats why small people can eat and eat, and their body’s mibetolasm doesnt give. In order to speed up mibetolasm, eat small portion, up to 4-6 times a day food. Also, you can do training, like circuit training. It focuses on higher reps with faster workouts, while bulking is lower reps( 6-10 ) and a slower time to rest. See circuit training trains to speed up your heart quicker, hence speeding up adrenaline, which makes for faster mibetolasm. You can also just train for higher reps. If you want to bulk, lower reps, and eat 3-4 times a day, good meals, still keeping it healthy. So really it all depends, there are different ways. Dont know If I answered your question per say. Also, yes, if you eat more than what you need you can gain weight, although depends on how active, and how you eat.

    • Thanks for your comment, Arvin. While the classic “many small meals a day” theory is still widely accepted, there is emerging evidence that it can put the body into a constant state of glucose dependence. We are now discovering that when you train your body not to rely on this constant glucose supply, the body adapts with greater metabolic efficiency. Furthermore, dietary and exercise choices depend largely on the individual’s goals. For example, the proposed metabolic benefits of train-low, race-high tactic discussed above are not weight-loss necessarily, but long-term adaptations for improved endurance and performance.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s